Are You Underspending in Retirement? (Week 10)
The
media frequently talks about how little many people have saved for
retirement. This often leads to
headlines such as “ (Addressing
the Nation's Retirement Crisis).” Since I tend to be curious about such
things, over the years I’ve asked numerous financial advisors if any of their
clients are likely to experience such a crisis.
Every one of them has given me the same answer – “No.” Granted that a financial advisor’s practice
is going to be naturally skewed to those with relatively high amount of savings. Still, it seems likely to me that at least
some of their clients run the risk of running out of money. When I asked this follow up question, I
almost always got the same answer. When
uncertainty begins to creep into their retirement plan, their clients had
demonstrated an amazing ability and willingness to reduce their spending. Retirees understand that they don’t know how
long they will live, what returns they will have on their savings and what
unexpected expenses they will incur.
Therefore, no one can tell them with certainty how much they will
need. The solution many of them have
settled upon is both simple and sensible.
If I retire with $1 million in savings, as long as I maintain that
amount, I know I won’t run out of money.
Therefore, I’ll tap into those savings for additional retirement income
only if I’m comfortable above that amount.
If the stock market causes my balance to fall below that $1 million or I
have an unexpected expense, I just reduce my spending and let my retirement balance
grow back to my $1 million threshold.
As sensible as this plan is, it flies in the face of the standard
4% withdrawal rate rule. This rule
states that if you can take 4% of your account each year without fear of
running out of money before you die. But
in real life, very few retirees do this.
In fact, a New York Life/Morning Consult study found that only 16% of
retirees take regular systematic withdrawals from their retirement
savings. A full 30% take nothing at
all. The rest just take money as they
need it. This approach leads to many retirees
actually underspend in retirement. While
they continue to worry about running out of money, their retirement accounts
just continue to grow. David Blanchett
and Michael Finke have referred to this as the “retirement consumption puzzle.” In their recent study, they found that while
retirees feel free to spend 80% of the guaranteed income they get from social
security, pensions and annuities, they only spend 50% of the income they earn
on their retirement accounts (RP-30_BlanchettFinke_v3.pdf).
I thought about these statistics this week when my wife and
I spent the Labor Day weekend at Big Cedar Lodge outside of Branson, MO. If you haven’t been to this golf, boating and
entertainment mecca, you definitely need to put it on your list. For you golfers out there, there is a reason
that USA Today named Big Cedar the #1 golf resort in the country. At first blush, the cost of the 18-hole par 3
Cliffhanger course seemed excessive. Is
this really something we should be spending our retirement income on? Especially when they made us sign a waiver
that said that not only could we not sue them if we drove our cart over a cliff,
but we would be responsible for the cost of the cart. By the 3rd hole – one that
required us to hit our tee shot through an opening of a water fall to a green
140 yards away, we had little doubt that this was the very type of experience
we want to enjoy in retirement. It
certainly didn’t hurt that the Blue Angels were performing out of the local
airport just 3 miles away and therefore kept flying over us as we were trying
to concentrate on our next shot.
I felt comfortable splurging this weekend because I trust
the math of the 4% rule. More
importantly, the income I will get from my annuities in a few years gives me
the peace of mind to know that we will be able to cover most of our expected
expenses even if something catastrophic blows up the 4% rule. But there is another aspect to this as
well. One of my high school friends died
this week at the age of 64. Last year an
industry colleague died unexpectedly at the age of just 61. The uncertainty of how long we will live
works both ways. We all know someone who
died before they had a chance begin checking items off of their bucket
list. Even if we make it beyond our life
expectancy, there will come a time in our life where we just won’t be able to
physically do some activities. I’m more
than happy to spend a bit more today on some of these life experiences even if
it means I will have to spend a little less later.
Comments
Post a Comment