What's So Magical About a Traditional 60/40 Portfolio? by Scott Stolz, CFP, RICP (week 40)
When building any type of portfolio, the financial services industry almost always assumes that a portfolio made up of 60% stocks and 40% bonds is the proper place to start. This is especially true with a retirement portfolio since by definition pre-retirees and retirees are older and are assumed to be more conservative. But is this really the right way to go? Before I tackle this topic, I should acknowledge upfront that I’ve never bought a bond in my life. And I likely never will. In the long run, stocks always outperform bonds, so I’ve never seen the point of adding bonds to my portfolio. Don’t get me wrong. There were certainly time periods such as the financial crisis of 2007-09 when I wish I owned bonds instead of stocks. But no one can predict with any accuracy when such times will occur. Now that doesn’t mean I don’t understand the potential benefits. Proponents of a 60/40 portfolio will highlight the followi...